Thursday, May 17, 2007

May 17, 2007 - Ron Paul Voted Off Future Debates


Yes dear friends, it didn't take long, did it? The American Idol-type "debates" the GOP and media poobahs put on for the masses are now starting a movement to oust Rep. Ron Paul, the GOP's real "maverick" (as opposed to the egocentric and inconsistent John McCain), from any further candidate beauty show spectacles (aka "debates") because he strays from the RNC/neo-con script and tells the truth about things. And after just one "debate" too. Hell, Simon Cowell would probably have voted to keep Paul on just for the entertainment value his comments have alone. And all of which shows what a fraud this whole process is anyhow.

I saw this new story on the Drudge Report today about how the Chairman of the Michigan Republican Party wants Paul excluded from any party-sanctioned debates here in my state. Sad it is when you get bounced (voted off?) for telling the inconvenient truth about things, eh?

" 'Given what he said last night," the story reports, "it was just so off the wall and out of whack that I think it was more detrimental than helpful.' [Michigan GOP chairman Saul] Anuzis said his petition would go to debate sponsors and broadcasters to discourage inviting Paul."

And so it goes.

Technorati Tags:

2 comments:

zrated said...

i messaged anuzis and he replied with this:

http://migop.blogs.com/blog/2007/05/rnc_debate_peti.html

i read it and don't have a clue what it means. is he in or out? is it certain? this is confusing to me and if he's out i will be truly enraged.

i haven't seen this verified anywhere yet.

The Anarchist Flamethrower said...

What your reply means is that Anuzis is embarrassed, as he should be, for trying to oust Dr.Paul for honestly stating his views.